A Proposal of a Method for Finding the Longitude at Sea within a Degree, or Twenty Leagues. By Dr. Edmund Halley, Astr. Reg. Vice-President of the Royal Society. With an Account of the Progress He Hath Made Therein, by a Continued Series of Accurate Observations of the Moon, Taken by Himself at the Royal Observatory at Greenwich

Author(s) Edmund Halley
Year 1731
Volume 37
Pages 12 pages
Language en
Journal Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775)

Full Text (OCR)

I. A Proposal of a Method for finding the Longitude at Sea within a Degree, or twenty Leagues. By Dr. Edmund Halley, Astr. Reg. Vice-President of the Royal Society. With an Account of the Progress he hath made therein, by a continued Series of accurate Observations of the Moon, taken by himself at the Royal Observatory at Greenwich. It is now above twenty Years since I added an Appendix to the second Edition of Mr. Street's Caroline Tables, containing a Set of Observations I had made in the Years 1683 and 1684, for ascertaining the Moon's Motion; and giving a Specimen of what I thought, at that Time, might be the only practicable Method of attaining the Longitude at Sea. What I printed so long ago, is as follows: "The Advantages of the Art of finding the Longitude at Sea, are too evident to need any Arguments to prove them. And having by my own Experience found the Impracticability of all other Methods proposed for that Purpose, but that derived from a perfect Knowledge of the Moon's Motion; I was ambitious, if possible, to overcome the Difficulties that attend the Discovery thereof. "And first, I had found it only needed a little Practice to be able to manage a five or six Foot Telescope, capable of shewing the Appulses or Occultations of the Fix'd Stars by the Moon, on Shipboard, in moderate Weather; especially in the First and Last Quarters of the Moon's Age, when her weaker Light does not so much efface that of the Stars. Whereas the Eclipses of the Satellites of Jupiter, how proper soever for Geographical Purposes, were absolutely unfit at Sea, as requiring Telescopes of a greater Length than can well be directed in the rolling Motion of a Ship in the Ocean. Now the Motion of the Moon being so swift, as to afford us scarce ever less than two Minutes for each Degree of Longitude, and sometimes two and a half; it is evident, that were we able perfectly to predict the true Time of the Appulse or Occultation of a Fix'd Star, in any known Meridian, we might, by comparing therewith the Time observed on Board a Ship at Sea, conclude safely how much the Ship is to the Eastward or Westward of the Meridian of our Calculus. But after much Examination, and carefully collating the Caroline Tables of Mr. T. Street (though generally better than those that went before him) as likewise those of Tycho, Kepler, Bullialdus, and our Horrox, with many accurate Observations of the Moon, carefully made on Land; it does not appear that any of these Tables do represent the Motions with the Certainty required; and though many times the Agreement seems surprizing, when the Errors of the several Equations compensate one another; yet in those Parts of the Orb where they all fall the same Way, the Fault is intolerable, and the Result many times not to be depended on, to more than one hundred Leagues; that is to say, it is wholly insufficient. Yet Yet still this Fault is *Artificis*, not *Artis*: For observing the *Period* of the *Lunar Inequalities*, which is performed in eighteen Years and eleven Days, or two hundred and twenty-three *Lunations*; it is found that the Returns of the Eclipses, and other Phænomena of the Moon's Motion, are very regularly performed; so that whatever Error you found in a former Period, the same is again repeated in a second, under the like Circumstances of the same Distance of the Moon from the Sun and *Apogæon*. Thus, from the Observation made of the Eclipse of the Sun, which was June 22, 1666, in the Morning, seen at London and Dantzick, I was enabled to predict, with great Certainty, that other, which I observed July 2, 1684, by allowing the same Error I found in the Calculus of the former. And the like with equal Certainty will do, in the Cases extra Syzygias, when the Mean and Synodical Anomalies are nearly the same, about the same time of the Year. Being thus assured, from the Certainty of these Revolutions, that all the intermediate Errors of our Tables were not uncertain Wandrings, but regular Faults of the Theories; I next thought how I might best be informed of the Quantity and Places of these Defects: That being apprized how much, and which Way my Numbers erred, I might apply the Difference, so as at all times to represent the true Motion of the Moon. Nor was there any other Way, but from the Heavens themselves, to derive this Correction, by a sedulous and continued Series of Observations, to be collated with the Calculus, and the Errors noted in an Abacus: From whence, at all Times, under the like Situation of the Sun and Moon, I might take out the Correction to be allowed. And having by me the Sextant I made to observe the Southern Stars at St. Helena, in the Year 1677, I fixed it for this Purpose; re- solving to have continued to observe, till I had filled my Abacus, so as it might have the Effect of exact Lunar Tables, capable to serve at Sea, for finding the Longitude with the desired Cer- tainty. With this Design, I applied the Leisure I had procured myself about the Year 1683, to observe di- ligently, as often as the Heavens would permit, the true Place of the Moon, especially as to Longitude; and in the Space of about sixteen Months I had gotten near two hundred several Days Observations, most of which I collated with the Horroxian Theory (whose Calculus is something more com- pendious than that of Mr. Street) and having pla- ced the Errors in an Abacus, I perceived how re- gular the Irregularities were, and that where the Moon had been exactly observed formerly, at the Distance of one or more Periods of two hundred twenty-three Months, I could even predict the Error of the Tables, with a Certainty not much inferior to that of the Observations themselves. But this Design of mine was soon interrupted by unforeseen domestic Occasions, which obliged me to postpone all other Considerations to that of the Defence of my Patrimony: And, since then, my frequent Avocations have not permitted me to assume these Thoughts. In the mean time I have taken Care to present my Observations, such as they are, to the Publick, in order to preserve them; assuring, that as on the one Hand they were made with a very sufficient Instrument, with all the Care and Diligence requisite; so in the remote Voyages I have since taken to ascertain the Magnetick Variations, they have been of signal Use to me, in determining the Longitude of my Ship, as often as I could get Sight of a near Transite of the Moon by a known Fix'd Star: And thereby I have frequently corrected my Journal from those Errors which are unavoidable in long Sea-Reckonings. If therefore you happen at Sea to observe nicely the Time of an Occultation or close Application of a Star to the Moon; and can find a correspondent Observation, about the same mean Anomaly and Distance of the Moon from the Sun (either among these of mine, or in any other Collection of Observations accurately made) especially near the same Time of the Year; and, above all, after the aforesaid Period of eighteen Years and eleven Days, you may, without sensible Error, from thence pronounce in what Meridian your Ship is; taking Care in so operate a Calculation, to commit no Mistake; and, notwithstanding the Direction the Moon gives you, not confining so much therein as to omit any of the usual Precautions to preserve a Ship when she approaches the Land. I had "I had intended to insist more largely upon this Method of obtaining the Moon's Place, and, by Consequence, the Longitude at Sea, but that I find, that it requires a just Treatise, too long to be here subjoined: And, more especially, that the great Sir Isaac Newton (to whom no Mathematical Difficulty is insuperable) has been pleased to give us a True and Physical Theory of the Moon's Motions, whereby the Defects of all former Tables are so far amended, that it is hoped the Error may scarce ever exceed three Minutes of Motion, or so little in Longitude; that, perhaps, it may be thought a sufficient Exactness for all the Uses of Navigation. If therefore what is here offered find a kind Acceptance from those that it chiefly concerns, I shall be encouraged to proceed on a Work I have long meditated, to improve the above-mentioned Period, as to the abbreviating the Computation of Eclipses, and, in general, to facilitate the too laborious Calculation of the Moon's Place extra Syzygias. Not long after her late Majesty Queen Anne was pleased to bestow upon the Publick, an Edition of the much greater, and most valuable Part of Mr. Flamsteed's Observations; by Help of which the great Sir Isaac Newton had formed his curious Theory of the Moon, a first Sketch of which was inserted by Dr. David Gregory in his Astronomiae Physicae & Geometricae Elementa, published at Oxford, 1702; and again, in the second Edition of Sir Isaac's Principia, which came out in 1713, we have the same same revised and amended by himself, to that Degree of Exactness, that the Faults of the Computus formed therefrom rarely exceed a quarter Part of what is found in the best Lunar Tables before that Time extant. Being thus provided with proper Materials, viz. a large Set of Observations, and a Theory of the Motions so very near the Truth, I resumed my former Design of filling up my Abacus or Synopsis of the Defects of this Lunar Theory, and made Tables to expedite the Calculus according thereto, and compared the Numbers thereof with many of the most certain of Mr. Flamsteed's Places observed. By this it was evident that Sir Isaac had spared no Part of that Sagacity and Industry so peculiar to himself, in settling the Epoches, and other Elements of the Lunar Astronomy, the Result many times, for whole Months together, rarely differing two Minutes of Motion from the Observations themselves; nor is it unlikely but good Part of that Difference may have been the Fault of the Observer. And where the Errors were found greater, it was in those Parts of the Lunar Orb where Mr. Flamsteed had very rarely given himself the Trouble of observing; viz. in the third and fourth Quarter of the Moon's Age, where sometimes these Differences would amount to at least five Minutes. Mr. Flamsteed was long enough possessed of the Royal Observatory to have had a continued Series of Observations for more than two Periods of eighteen Years; by which he had it in his Power to have done all that could be expected from Observation, towards towards discovering the Law of the Lunar Motions. But he contented himself with sparse Observations, leaving wide Gaps between, so as to omit frequently whole Months together; and in one Case the whole Year 1716. So that notwithstanding what he has left us must be acknowledged more than equal to all that was done before him, both as to the Number and Accuracy of his Accounts; yet for want of an uninterrupted Succession of them, they are not capable of discovering, in the several Situations of the Lunar Orbit, what Corrections are necessary to be allowed, to supply the Deficiencies of our Computus. On Mr. Flamsteed's Decease, about the Beginning of the Year 1720, his late Majesty King George I. was graciously pleased to bestow upon me the agreeable Post of his Astronomical Observer, expressly commanding me to apply myself with the utmost Care and Diligence to the rectifying the Tables of the Motions of the Heavens, and the Places of the Fix'd Stars, in order to find out the so much desired Longitude at Sea, for the perfecting the Art of Navigation. These are the Words of my Commission; and here I might have thought myself in a Condition to put in Execution my long projected Design of compleating my Abacus, or Table of the Defects of our Lunar Numbers; but on taking Possession, I found the Observatory wholly unprovided of Instruments, and indeed of every thing else that was moveable, which postponed my Endeavours till such Time as I could furnish myself with an Apparatus capable of the Exactness requisite. And this was the more grievous to me, on account of my advanced Age, Age, being then in my sixty-fourth Year, which put me past all Hopes of ever living to see a compleat Period of eighteen Years Observation. But, Thanks to God, he has been pleased hitherto to afford me sufficient Health and Vigour to execute my Office in all its Parts with my own Hands and Eyes, without any Assistance or Interruption, during one whole Period of the Moon's Apogee; which Period is performed in somewhat less than nine Years. In this Time I have been able to observe the Right Ascension of the Moon at her Transit over the Meridian, near fifteen hundred times (and with an Exactness, I am bold to say, preferable to anything done before) a Number not less than those of the noble Tycho Brahe, Hevelius and Flamsteed, taken in one Sum, there being near four of my Lunar Observations for each Degree of the Zodiack, as also for each Degree of the Argumentum annum, or Distance of the Sun from the Moon's Apogee. And that these might be duly applied to rectify the Defects of our Computations, I have myself compared with the aforementioned Tables, made according to Sir Isaac's Principles, not only my own Observations, but also above eight hundred of Mr. Flamsteed's. This Comparison of my own Observations (from the Time I esteem them compleat) with the Computus by the said Tables, being now continued for above nine Years, I design speedily to communicate it to the Publick, together with the Tables themselves, which have been printed, and should long since have been published, had not my Post at Greenwich given me an Opportunity to examine, with proper Nicety, in what what Parts of the Lunar Orb, and how much, our Numbers erred. So useful an Addition as this, it is hoped may fully answer the long delayed Expectation some Persons may have had of seeing the said Tables sooner. By Means thereof, those that are qualified may, if they please, examine by their own Observation the Truth of what is here asserted. Comparing likewise many of the most accurate of Mr. Flamsteed, made eighteen or thirty-six Years before (that is one or two Periods before mine) with those of mine which tallied with them, I had the Satisfaction to find that what I had proposed in 1710 was fully verified; and that the Errors of the Calculus in 1690 and 1708, for Example, differed insensibly from what I found in the like Situation of the Sun and Apogee, in the Year 1726. The great Agreement of the Theory with the Heavens compensating the Differences that might otherwise arise from the Incommensurability and Excentricity of the Motions of the Sun, Moon and Apogee. Encouraged by this Event, I next examined what Differences might arise from the Period of nine Years wanting nine Days, in which Time there are performed very nearly one hundred and eleven Lunations, or Returns of the Moon to the Sun; but the Return of the Sun to the Apogee in that Time differing above four times as much from an exact Revolution as in the Period of eighteen Years, I could not expect the like Agreement in that. However, having now entered upon the tenth Year, I compared what I had observed in the Years 1721 and 1722, with my late Observations of 1730 and 1731, and have rarely found a Difference of more more than one single Minute of Motion (Part of which may probably arise from the small Uncertainty that always attends Astronomical Observation) but most commonly this Difference was wholly insensible; so that by the Help of what I observed in 1722, I presume I am able to compute the true Place of the Moon with Certainty, within the Compass of two Minutes of her Motion, during this present Year 1731, and so for the future. This is the Exactness requisite to determine the Longitude at Sea to twenty Leagues under the Equator, and to less than fifteen Leagues in the British Channel. It remains therefore to consider after what Manner Observations of the Moon may be made at Sea with the same Degree of Exactness: But since our worthy Vice-President John Hadley, Esq; (to whom we are highly obliged for his having perfected and brought into common Use the Reflecting Telescope) has been pleased to communicate his most ingenious Invention of an Instrument for taking the Angles with great Certainty by Reflection, (Vide Transact. No 420.) it is more than probable that the same may be applied to taking Angles at Sea with the desired Accuracy. II. An Account of the Contrayerva, by Mr. William Houstoun, Surgeon in the Service of the Honourable South-Sea Company. CONTRAYERVA is a Spanish Word, signifying as much as Herba contra [Venena] or an Herb against Poisons. And as there are in all Countries different