Some Reflexions Made on the Enlarged Accompt of Dr Witties Answer to Hydrologia Chymica in Numb 51. of these Tracts; Chiefly Concerning the Cause of the Sudden Loss of the Vertues of Mineral Waters
Author(s)
Anonymous
Year
1669
Volume
4
Pages
7 pages
Language
en
Journal
Philosophical Transactions (1665-1678)
Full Text (OCR)
plication of Cole-leaves, good quantity of sanious matter. And
the Patient complaining also at that time of grievous interjunc-
ture pains, especially upon the Tibia, I suspected &c., and ap-
plied Empl. de Ran, * * * and gave her 3. succeeding mor-
nings * * * for a dose. The third day, it wrought sursum &
decorum pretty briskly; after which her pains vanished and ma-
ny of those villosulae; and her breasts (which, since her Case;
formerly sent up, were grown considerably bigger and very pain-
ful) much lessened, and her pains also; and she, though
drooping much before, and out of hopes of life, exceedingly
revived. This indicated to me, what I was further to do for
her. I gave her on sunday last * * *; which wrought upward
plentifully; and she daily gets strength since, and her Breasts
abate. I designe to salivate her, in hopes to correct that viti-
ous ferment, which is spued out of the Genus nervosum into the
Breasts, and contributes much to those tumors. But I shall
now stop my hand, &c.
Plymouth Septemb. 17. 1669.
Some Reflexions:
Made on the enlarged Accompt of Dr Witties Answer to Hydrolo-
gia Chymica in Numb 51. of these Tracts; chiefly concerning
the Cause of the sudden loss of the virtues of Mineral waters.
These Notes were made by the Learned Dr Daniel Foot, in a friendly
Letter of his (dated October 11th. 1669.) to the Publisher, as fol-
lows.
Sir
Your last publish'd Transactions No 51. have administered
the occasion, and the Candour, I know you possess,
hath encouraged me to give you this trouble. In your enlarged
accompt of D. Witties Answer to Hydrol. Chymica, p. 1039.
l. 21. you say; This I had not here mentioned, but to introduce our
Authors weighty remark; That these waters loose all their virtue,
yea their quaint and bulk also, though in Glasses and under the Her-
metic seal, if removed from the fountain-head &c. Now, Sir,
'tis a truth, if not universally, yet generally known and atten-
ted to by unlearned as well as learned, that some sort of Medi-
cinal
cinal waters loose their virtue, if remov'd to any considerable distance from their fountain head; but others do not, at least not so soon. To this last sort belong such, as are our Barnet, Epsham and Dullidge waters; to the other sort belong our Tunbridg, Astrap and Stall-bridge-waters; and all such like here or elsewhere: And the common usage of the Sick, taken from the advice of their Physicians, and the Experience of all, in repairing to those respective places, sufficiently proves the common consent therunto.
But though the effect be so plain and manifest, yet the cause thereof seems not to me so plainly discovered; and because you are pleased to your fore-cited words to subjoin these; And even their quantity and bulk also, though in Glasses and under the Herm. Seal &c.: I suppose, you intimate and offer, that the cause of the loss of their Medicinal virtues is upon the loss of their quantity and bulk: which also you aptly strengthen by the authority of the famous Doctors, French, ab Heer, and Frambearius; and then in a parenthesis you put altogether, and cautiously say (doubtless thorough the loss of the Volatile Spirits) &c. And in the beginning of the very next paragraph you goe on thus; Whatever these Spirits be, that will neither endure to travel from the Place, nor will be confined in any bottle, nor under any seal &c. So that the sum of your Conjecture (for as other you propose it not) is, That this loss consists in the Avolation of some most subtle and penetrating Spirituous parts, not to be imprisoned by any inclosure imaginable, but will find their way out, and leave the waters bereft of virtue, and decreased in quantity too, and (what more is) perhaps of their weight also, especially if they loose of their quantity. But to this last you modestly add, Here we want instruction, whether that decrease was as well of weight, as of bulk &c.
That this Conjecture of yours concerning the Cause of the loss of virtues in these waters carried from their Spring, may be true, I do not absolutely deny, but further acknowledge, that it is the sentiment of very many, if not all, Physicians and Naturalists, that have concerned themselves with the consideration thereof; and I myself have entertained the very same thoughts.
thoughts of it, and do not now but suppositively relinquish them. But having lately, in reading Tachenius's Hippocr. Chymicus (newly recommended by yourself in No. 50. of your Transact.) found c. 16. somewhat relating to this matter; I began by the encouragement of his authority to resume some Conjectures touching the same, which I had, if not abandoned, yet kept suppress in silence, which indeed are of another kind, but how true I yet know not. Wherefore I thought, it might not be very unacceptable to you, if I desired you, publickly to give notice of these Conjectures, that the Learned may reason and find out the truth of them; whence may result no few nor very unuseful discoveries for the increase of knowledge, the benefit of mankind, and the glory of the Creator of all. In order thereunto I desire, you will propose these or such like Queries;
1. Whether by Chymical researches it was ever yet or can be found, that such waters as the above-said, ever yielded either a Vinous or an Acid, or any other sort of Spirits, that were either inflammable, or un-inflammable, or flying over the Helix from the fire.
2. Whether all these sorts of Waters, when they are most closely stopp'd up, and so let stand, or conveyed to some distance, do not let fall a sediment (most commonly) yellowish, or of some such colour, when they are become effete in their vessels.
3. Whether, when they are let stand only, and not moved by carriage, they do not sooner become castrated, and sooner precipitate an Ochre to the bottom?
4. Whether such an Ochre is not found in all their Spring-heads, and Streams also; but more in the Head than in the Streams, especially if issued there-from to a good distance.
5. Whether it may not be found upon due Observation, that two Bottles of the said waters, whereof the one being industriously stopp'd, the other left unstopp'd, and both equally permitted to stand still or equally moved, will nor equally loose their virtues Medicall in the same space of time, and have the same precipitated sediment, and be of the same taste, colour, and alike diminish in quantity, with divers others such like circumstances?
6. Whether two Vessels, diversified in their matter, and consequently in their parts, pores and figures of the whole (as e.g., a Glass-bottle and an Ox-bladder, or any two such like) filled with such waters, will not yield the like Phanomena in all circumstances, as in the 5th Query are mentioned?
7. Whether it may be devised, how to prevent all precipitation of a sediment in the Waters vessels up; and then to observe thereupon, whither their virtues would not be kept entire during such a prevention?
8. Whether any Observer ever found the Waters enervated but found withall an Ochre, let fall to the bottom or sides of the containing vessel?
9. To be brief, Whether the Phanomenon of loss of virtues in such Waters may by an Hypothesis of an intestine Precipitation of their parts, wherein those virtues consisted, be as well (if not better) explicated, than by the Hypothesis of an Avolation of Spirituous parts through all Vessels and closures whatsoever?
Which Hypothesis that it may be the better weighed, I shall only exhibit it, and leave it to the Ingenious and Learned to conclude concerning it.
First therefore it is generally received amongst most, especially the more polite Chymical Authors and Students, That, if any Medical virtues be in Minerals or Metals, it consists in their Sulphurs, which are of a Volatile and Alcalisate property; especially when not intimately conmmix't with, or after commixture perfectly freed from their Mercurial parts.
Next, its as much received, even to become a Cymical Maxime, That Acids and Alcalys mutually operate upon one another to a satiety, to an abating, and (if circumstances correspond) to an utter amission of their former activities, and lastly to a production of a Tertium nentrum.
Again they alike conclude, that Salts act best in a State of Solution. All which Premises thus concenter in this Hypothesis; That the Waters, which materially make some Springs, passing underground by the veine of some Metal, which yet is in fieri, having first taken up of an Acide Salt which is in the Earth, thereby catcheth hold on the immature Sulphur of that Metal,
Metal, and presently glides itself along with itself to the Springs orifice; and from the moment of the Sulphur and Acide Salt's meeting and contact begins a mutual action and reaction upon one another which never ceaseth, till both are imperceptibly spent, and blended into a new Body, which then the water lets fall, and we call an Earth, Ochre, or Sediment: After the production of which Ochre, the Medicinal virtues of the immature Sulphur is locked up into the inseparable embraces of the Acid Salt, and so is lost, or at least disappears. But this mutual action and reaction may last, till the Waters issue out of the Earth, and for some small time longer, and so long their Medical virtues are to be imparted, and no longer.
This, Sir, is the Hypothesis of Tachenius (if I rightly apprehend him) which I send, not to have it justle out the more received one, or any other that may be proposed; but that it may have its Tryall, and accordingly may live or dye. I could alledge more in its behalf, especially in the particular of such a Body, as we commonly call an Ochre; resulting from divers Experiments of Vitriol: but I have trespassed too much already to hope for pardon from any, but &c.
An Accomp of two Books
I. GUAGING EPITOMISED, by MICHAEL DARY. London, Printed by W. Godbid 1669. upon one folio page.
A Table of Squares and Cubes is of general use, but more particularly in Guaging, for taking away Proportional work in computing the Contents of Brewers Tuns from inch to inch, or by as great portions as you please; or for making the Tables of Gallon-measure for Mr. Oughtred's Guage-Rod: Yea each kind of Table doth much expedite the Guaging of Caske, as may be seen in this Printed Sheet of Mr. Dary, wherein he supposeth, that a Beer or Ale-Gallon contains (according to the late Establishment by Law) 282 Cubical inches; a Wine-Gallon, according to custom and Experiment, 281 Cubical Inches: And he takes an Example (of a Canary P.p.) whose diameter at the Bung is \{3\} inches, and Length 44 inches. And